All around NAV dev and test
... or should I regard it as an early Xmas 2017 present?
Any how, I am grateful! And seeing the number of votes on my connect entry, I am certainly not the only one. So thanx on behalf of all of the voters (if I may).
You might wonder what's this all about. However, you might also recall the post I did just before Xmas last year: Hey Mr. Microsoft, My Documentation Trigger is not an Xmas Tree.
Well, apparently this has been fixed in the newest cummulative update for NAV 2016: Cumulative Update 12 for Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2016 (Build 47042). Good reason for me down load and test.
Big thanx to Natalie Karolak for notifying me on this.
Chew, it has been quite some time we met here. Feels like learning to blog again. If you have been waiting for me all that time I make a deep bow and apologize for that. It has been a very busy 8 month period starting last December bringing our NAV 2009 R2 classic environment eventually to NAV 2016 last July. And after that ... a well deserved vacation in our little house down south in France. I guess it never felt more like that: time to take a leave and enjoy live in a total different way. And we sure did.
And now back on the job again. But with one major change: we're on 2016 now. Finally. FINALLY! Over three years ago I joined Van Dijk Educatie to get their Dynamics NAV installation to the latest version, NAV 2013 R2 at that time, but due to higher operational priorities, and to my dismay, it was postponed a couple of times. But we made it. Just before our high season started, end of July, and to the satisfaction of all our colleagues. Go Live on Monday July 4th went smoothly. We had been on it for all those 8 months, getting from NAV 2009 R2 classic to NAV 2009 R2 RTC in February and then straight to NAV 2016 in July. I must say it was quite an effort from dev and test with great involvement from all. And yes, we have a nice number of lessons learned to share with you. Hope I will find time enough to get that done, here, so stay tuned.
Well, let's take the bull by the horns, as we say over here; let's start immediately. With an issue that had been bugging our operation ever since I went out to enjoy may vacation. Pure coincidence of course.
I was informed that our colleagues were frequently experiencing deadlocks on the Warehouse Request table (5765), which sounded unfamiliar to me. Looking in the history of our 2009 installation TAB5765 was hardly ever an issue, but I noticed we had some customization on this object from way back in 2012, fixing ... deadlock issues!
Apparently TAB5765 standard primary key (PK) was sub optimal:
Type,Location Code,Source Type,Source Subtype,Source No.
The selectivity of the first PK field Type, with only 2 values, was clearly to low, where as the selectivity of the last PK field, Source No., was very high. For this reason, by means of the SQLIndex property of the PK, the SQL index was changed to:
Source No.,Location Code,Source Type,Source Subtype,Type
It indeed did solve the performance issue at that time.
The PK wasn't changed by MS and we had kept the SQLIndex property customization on the PK. But clearly, monitoring the deadlocks it showed that it was using the PK.
However, looking at the SQL implementation of the PK, I could not believe my eyes:
Do you see what I mean? It's the standard PK structure:
Not the one defined by the SQLIndex property:
This is somewhat scary. Is SQLIndex not working anymore?
Technically it could have been a candidate for the Clean Team as there is no need for this property anymore since we're on SQL only since NAV 2013. But ... migrating old code that uses SQLIndex to 2013 or beyond should however implement the key as defined by SQLIndex.
Some more detailed investigation learned me the following:
I have tested this for NAV 2013 R2 and NAV 2016, but probably also applies to NAV 2013 and 2016.
Why C/SIDE has changed this way I have no clue, but it scares me somewhat.
Mr. MS could you tell us why? If not please revert to the old behavior.
Indeed as David points out the non-optimal PK should have been fixed by MS and even more, the app code also, as there are a number of GET calls that have to be restructured to reflect the updated PK structure. Here is the list of objects that are affected:
Not long after this post I reported the issue to Microsoft and they acknowledged the bug on the SQLIndex property and informed me that it will be fixed in the next Cumulative Update.
Regarding the non-optimal PK: this is still under investigation and apparently has lower priority as this has potential more impact on all installations out there.
Apparently we keep on running into this issue once in a while. While developing you run your objects from the Objects Designer and with each single execution a new Windows Client session is being fired. Using your valuable time and frustrating your debug session as the previous one is not valid anymore and you have to start a new one. If I recall this right it first happened when NAV 2013RTM and R2 were installed side-by-side and we got a fix for that from MS.
In the meanwhile I didn't get bugged by this until a couple of weeks ago after I created a new Azure machine for NAV 2016 which contained CU 3. As I was busy preparing various courses and needed my time for that I didn't allow myself to fix the issue, somewhat annoying my students, with every other object I launched from the development environment. Triggered by this old post showing up in my dynamicsuser RSS-feed subscription (another annoying phenomenon), and having some time today, I decided to get this thing solved for my NAV 2016 CU 3 installation.
The old post was too old for my issue, but from this I got to others. Through NAV RTC is opening for each run of object I eventually bumped on this one that helped me out fast and easy. Thanx Chris et al.
To prevent myself from having to search again next time this small blog post.
Since NAV 2013 we are more and more getting the full potential out of SQL Server.
In NAV 2009 (and before) it was, for example, unimaginable to setup "your own" sorting for your data retrieval as SETCURRENTKEY only allowed you to use the keys defined on the table you were going to query. Or not possible for users to sort their lists by any column, like they had been used to in, for example, Excel long time.
So now we get, more and more, the power of SQL directly accessible.
Now with NAV 2016 another step is made with SETASCENDING even though it only seems to be applicable on data processed by code (didn't get it working on data displayed in a page, temporary or not).
The next code example shows what that we can sort on individual columns (in this case Currency Code and Name).
OnRun() ShowSetAscending(TRUE); ShowSetAscending(FALSE)
LOCAL ShowSetAscending(IsAscending : Boolean) MESSAGE('Ascending = %1',FORMAT(IsAscending)); WITH Customer DO BEGIN SETCURRENTKEY("Currency Code",Name,Contact); SETFILTER("Currency Code",'SEK|USD|ZAR'); SETASCENDING("Currency Code",IsAscending); SETASCENDING(Name,NOT IsAscending); IF FINDSET THEN REPEAT MESSAGE( 'Customer %1\ %2\ %3', "No.", Name, "Currency Code"); UNTIL NEXT = 0; END
The field SETASCENDING is applied to, should be part of the sorting as defined by the current active SETCURRENTKEY. If not a runtime error will be thrown:
Cannot call SetAscending on field <field name> because it is not part of the current sorting.
Coming from a C/C++ world into NAV, ages ago, it was somewhat dismaying to feel the various constraints of the system. And true, to also feel the power of it, not in the least because of these constraints, IMHO. But hell, isn't this always the case when changing? I mean, when changing, whatever. Habits. Tools. On-premise to cloud. Your partner. Or we could be still in a honeymoon state of mind and find out the constraints later.
Well, long story short. One thing I was very surprised by was the BREAK statement in NAV. Probably I am wrong, but my head kept on saying: any programming language has a BREAK statement allowing to break out of the current loop (or switch) construction and continue just after it. And yes, NAV did have (and still has) a BREAK statement, but only within the Dataport, Report and XMLport objects.
And now, finally, after all these years [emotional sob], with NAV 2016, BREAK has become what-I-always-wanted-it-to-be, allowing me "... to break out of the current loop (or switch) construction and continue just after it."
And contrary to what the help topic title (still) seems to suggest BREAK Function (Report, XMLport), it is valid in any object now. Just try for example the following in a codeunit:
i = 6 THEN
It works just fine.
Reading the help topic in detail don't let yourself be mislead:
no BREXIT, i.e. BREAK <> EXIT
Because contrary to what the remark in the topic says (notice my red coloring):
BREAK causes the current trigger to end. When used inside a loop, such as a WHILE-DO or REPEAT-UNTIL construction, BREAK interrupts the loop and causes the current trigger to end.
Nope, BREAK will just interrupt the loop and "continue just after it". To cause the current trigger to end we already have EXIT don't we?
When you program a BREAK outside a loop the compiler will throw an error:
BREAK statement can only appear inside a loop (FOREACH, FOR, WHILE, REPEAT).