Luc van Vugt

Which of course is just another reason, why we our tools need to be as good as possible.

Thanks Luc,

Well I am a little ambivalent with this. The more code, the more code to maintain (both test and main), the higher the cost. While at the fact that we have tests (assuming a good covering test suite), then that will lower the risk, by being…

I have stumbled over this test some time ago as well, for the very same reason like yours. This test is really useful.
However, some of these failures needed to be ignored by adding lines to function 134926.ExcludeKnownInvalidTableRelationsFromBeingChecked…

It would also be nice if we had a property whether the FastTab is open or closed by default, when you open the page for the first time...
Quite a few users / consultants and even developers asked us if this is possible since the first versions of RTC.

Were you born in a barn - English

And in Afrikaans we say: "Were you born in a cave?"

Funny, we have almost the same saying in Danish, when someone doesn't close the door: "Have you been born in a circus?". Church or circus - basically the same...

Thnaks Luc, works well. One addition, if you want to get VS Studio code working on an existing upgraded database you need to follow step 19 in the Dataupgrade: docs.microsoft.com/.../upgrading-the-data

Recently I have been writing test codeunits for our ISV product, so I will take a look at this closer. Our codeunits have been added rather than customize the NAV supplied ones. Do you think it is better to customize the NAV supplied codeunits?

Awesome, Luc.

That are some very valuable additions!  Thanks, man!

Thanks Luc, you are truly our NAV Testability Crusader! (Couldn't find a crusader - so strong man emoticon must do)...