-
The most important thing is to use the most recent build of your NAV version to make sure it is supported to run with SQL 2008. If you are just migrating a "normal" NAV database, then it is basically "detach DB 2000 - copy to SQL 2008 - attach DB 2008" - then adjust config (Compatibility...
-
The most important thing is to use the most recent build of your NAV version to make sure it is supported to run with SQL 2008. If you are just migrating a "normal" NAV database, then it is basically "detach DB 2000 - copy to SQL 2008 - attach DB 2008" - then adjust config (Compatibility...
-
We have implemented Navision in several sites and are beginning to see performance issues each of these sites. All sites are running SQL server 2005, and windows 2003. Hardware is as per the HW guide and if anything we have future proved by over specing the HW. Transactions are roughly in the vicinty...
-
We have 8 Citrix servers. 6 of these with 4.02 client with one of the later hotfixes. 4.03 client on the remaining 2 citrix servers because they are newer. It works. No issues so far, I know its not purist but I so far I have no reason to doubt mixing 4.02 & 4.03. I reckon I will schedul in the 5...
-
Can you mix clients like that OK? In any case, why not just put 5.00 executables now. If you are upgrading anyway, surely thats the best so you don't need to do it again later. if you are not ready to risk 5.00 then at least put 4.00 SP3 everywhere, and not just on some work stations.
-
Its what Microsoft advised me to do. Quite a long story and would be happy to discuss again. I have some other posts on this websitre from a while back relating to plan guides, also check http://www.mibuso.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=16343&highlight=guide where it is also discussed. I am not a SQL...
-
one thing to watch out is this issue with 5.0 exe upgrade. http://www.mibuso.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17446&highlight=upgrade+executable
-
Why are you using planguides? Doesn't SQL use the correct index for the query?