February 2010 - Posts
The objects for NAV 2009 SP1 of the VAT2010 update are available as from today. As you might have been waiting for this (we haven't .. created our own NAV 2009 objects...), finally they're here. Go and finnish your last updates! Here is the landing page for partners. This is for the Belgian localization (for now), but I'm sure the rest will follow real soon. (funny, BE version of NAV2009 was release more then a year later then the W1 release ... but, NOT for the VAT2010 update! - things...
Since the hassle I got with my previous post, I'm not sure anymore what I'm allowed to post, and what not... . Sometimes, I've got the feeling that it's not a "straight border" or how do you call it in English .. it's not clearly defined. It's seems more like .. "It doesn't feel appropriate, so you're not allowed to". Anyway, same with this post. The Statement of Directions (SOD) . We're not allowed to distribute the document, but we ARE allowed...
*** REMOVED *** I had to remove this article, because I accidently used inside information, and I wasn't allowed to warn you all ... obviously. Anyway, all KB articles from my previous blog are up-to-date and everything is fine now: http://dynamicsuser.net/blogs/waldo/archive/2010/02/02/the-2010-vat-update-warning-bug.aspx
It keeps bugging us. We thought we were finished with the update of all our customes .. But nooo. There is a bug. There has been found a minor issue with "item ledger entries for EU services that are added to the Intrastat journal lines in Microsoft Dynamics NAV with VAT 2010 Update installed". More information you can find here: KB 979746 for Dynamics NAV 4.0 SP3, KB 979747 for Dynamics NAV 5.0 SP1, en KB 979748 for Dynamics NAV 2009 SP1 It comes down to a change in report 594. It's...
It's over, finished, done, happened, ... and I think we can say: it was a success . I had a few attendees that were saying that this was one of the most interesting evening events we ever organized. People were really happy they spared the time to come over .. it was worth it. At least .. that's what they told me [:/]. We slightly changed the approach this time. In the first "Connection Day", we had simply four concurrent session. There, we noticed that people just tend to go to...